Conference Agenda & Scheduling

Search found 1 results for: "W-F2"
Session
HOW MIGHT A CLEANUP PAY FOR ITSELF & WHAT IS A BACKSTOP LIKE?    W-F2
Wednesday     10am to 11:30am
Room GOLD KEY I/II
Seating101 of 108 seats available
CreditsREHS: 1.5  
SpeakersDavid Von Aspern
ObjectiveENCOURAGEMENT OF REGULATORS IN A POST-LTCP ENVIRONMENT IN ASSISTING REDEVELOPMENT PROPONENTS; AND DESCRIBE COLLEGIAL EFFORTS AMONG COMPETING PARTIES
Description1 of 2: A 32-acre redevelopment project within an otherwise built-out area minutes from Sacramentos downtown core had a 90-year continuous industrial use as a lumber sawmill, storage, and drying facility, and wooden box and interior moldings plant. All these historical uses remained in the same family ownership the whole time! In-depth site history interviews were crucial to developing a sound conceptual site model (CSM). The large overall land area was divided into five Option Parcels. Over the approximate 90 years the facility operated, its footprint expanded southward from prominent downtown Sacramento thoroughfare, Broadway. The oldest portions of the former facility had frontage along Broadway; the newest and least utilized portion of the original property was at its southern end. Thus, redevelopment commenced at the southernmost property extent, where the least potential existed for hazardous materials impairment. The CSM included an overall soil and groundwater assessment and human health-based risk assessment under an unrestricted future land use. Then, each Option Parcel was further studied and mitigated as warranted. As each Option Parcel was deemed suitable for redevelopment, it was sold and the proceeds of the first sale helped pay for the remediation of the next Option Parcel. The resulting overall project was built-out as The Mill at Broadway. In an era of on-going housing demand, every residential product sold like hot cakes. 2 of 2: David will share some insights into what a post-LTCP redevelopment "backstop" looks like by presenting color photos collected in recent years from actual projects. As shared during quarterly Roundtable meetings hosted by SWRCB, David observed a number of regulatory agencies perhaps feeling a little anxiety over cost recovery, clear line of authority in a post-closure setting and potentially working with a new entity which was not party to escrow when the redevelopment site was previously studied and its case-closed.
Since we will be using our calcupa.org "My Itinerary" process for the 2025 Conference for Attendees to Earn CEUs, please create your Itinerary by going to the online agenda and clicking on the "+Add" button on the right of the page to Add Sessions you plan to attend to your "My Itinerary".  To View/Edit your Itinerary for Session Attendance, visit your My Itinerary.  We will provide further information on how to 'check in/out' of a Session to verify your attendance. If you have any questions, please email registration@calcupa.org.